Does “Christian outrage” work?
Several years ago, when The Da Vinci Code first graced bookstore shelves, I remember becoming aware of it not through its publisher’s marketing campaign or by favorable word-of-mouth recommendations from its readers, but through articles written by Christians (including several well-known apologists) denouncing it. The message of those many Christian articles—some angry, others calm, but all concerned—was that The Da Vinci Code was a Serious Threat that Christians ought to pay attention to.
Did all that talking help readers understand the flaws in The Da Vinci Code? Or did it just inadvertently promote the book, providing fodder for endless “Da Vinci Code controversy” news reports and turning a mediocre thriller novel into a subject of discussion in countless Christian households?
That’s the question raised by Christopher Hays in “The Folly of Answering Fools” at at Christianity Today. It argues that Christians, when we jump on offensive or controversial books, films, and games, inadvertently just end up playing into their promoters’ hands. Call it the “Christian Streisand effect“: the louder you object to something, the more you call attention to its existence. Here’s how Hays puts it:
[I do not] aim to silence genuine criticisms of the church or preclude taking seriously how non-Christians perceive the world. But not every insult is serious.
What I am saying is much simpler: Let’s be more circumspect about what we pluck from the roiling waters of culture and bring to the world’s attention.
I think it’s safe to say that when promoters manufacture fake Christian outrage to draw attention to their product, it’s time to re-evaluate the value of “Christian outrage.”
But here’s the challenge: it’s really, really hard to not speak up when you see a book or movie spreading misinformation about Christianity. Is keeping silent when a book or pundit attacks the church prudent, or will it be seen as an admission of defeat? How do you tell when a book or product is serious enough to merit a public Christian response?
Let’s be known for what we are for, not what we are against.
I like that motto, Nate!
I would say I’m concerned about some of the answer you have here on this website for the true christians out there.
Controversy creates conversation. If something like the Da Vinci Code creates conversation between Christian-to-Christian or Christian-to-nonChristian, it can be a great time for civil conversation about the facts. I look at it as a time to dig deeper so I can defend my faith. If people make money off of this phenomenon, don’t be bothered, be grateful that it is an opportunity for the Truth to be told.
First, we should understand that Christianity belong to Christ and only Christ should worry about anything that threatens his gospel. we should not be threatened whatsoever by anything anti Christ, but yet we should also not be ignorant. God did not prevent Satan to be in any contact with Adam and Eve, because he wanted them to be loyal to either the is Satan or not. Christians should not be afraid to read anti Christ materials such as the da vinci code,if they truthfully trust and believe God, and they should not worry if non christian read such materials if they are doing their Job of preaching the gospel.