Questions Answered by Scibel
Increasingly, the debate over science and religion--specifically when it concerns origins--has...
Questions Answered by AiG
Yesterday we highlighted a few articles from the ministry of Scibel. Today, I thought it would...
A New Journal from Answers in Genesis
If you're at all interested in the origins debate, keep an eye on this new Answers in Genesis...
Interview: Ben Stein Rebels
Ben Stein's new project Expelled is a critical look not at the shortcomings of Darwinian theory...
Expelled Screenwriter Explains How Miracles Are Made
Long a ghostwriter for several high-profile names, Kevin Miller's serendipitous encounter with...
The ministries in the Gospel.com Community organize information into 'topics' to help you find what you're looking for. Learn more
A God of Math & Order | Christian History Institute
The new science rode in on the shoulders of theological ideas. From the pages of Christian history magazine.
http://chitorch.org/index.php/chm/seventeenth-century/math/
The Impact of Christianity - Faith Facts
This article takes a historical look at the importance of the Christmas event--putting aside matters of theology or faith. See how Jesus' birth impacts the value of human life, education, government, science, the work ethic, art, music, literature and more....
http://faithfacts.org/christ-and-the-culture/The-Impact-of-Christianity
Theistic Evolution - Faith Facts
Some Christians feel compelled to try to reconcile evolution and creation through a view called "theistic evolution." The fundamental flaw in doing so is a failure to recognize evolution for what it is—an essentially atheistic philosophy. Read more...
http://faithfacts.org/evolution-or-creation/theistic-evolution
Are Christians "Anti-Science?" - Faith Facts
Not at all. Christianity views God as rational and trustworthy, which implies that His creation is rational and orderly and thus can be examined. Read more...
http://faithfacts.org/search-for-truth/questions-of-christians/are-christians-anti-science
Can creationists be “real” scientists? - Answers in Genesis
Some evolutionists have stated that those who believe in creation cannot be real scientists. Any use of science to support the biblical view of creation is called “pseudoscience.” But what is the truth?
http://answersingenesis.org/articles/wow/can-creationists-be-real-scientists
What’s wrong with progressive creation? - Answers in Genesis
One result of compromising with our evolutionary culture is the view of creation called the “day-age” theory or “progressive creation.” This view, while not a new one, has received wide publicity in the past several years. Much
http://answersingenesis.org/articles/wow/whats-wrong-with-progressive-creation
Does the astronomy of evolutionary origins fit with the Bible? - Answers in Genesis
The evolutionist story about how the universe came into existence proposes that billions of years ago the universe began in a tiny, infinitely hot and dense point called a singularity. This singularity supposedly contained not only all the mass and energy that would become everything...
http://answersingenesis.org/articles/wow/does-the-big-bang-fit
Did humans really evolve from ape-like creatures? - Answers in Genesis
They claim that anthropologists have found links in the human evolutionary chain and that scientists have “proven” evolution happens through DNA and other studies. But what is the real evidence for human evolution?
http://answersingenesis.org/articles/wow/did-humans-really-evolve
Are mutations part of the “engine” of evolution? - Answers in Genesis
In the evolutionary model, mutations are hailed as a dominant mechanism for pond-scum-to-people evolution and provide “proof” that the Bible’s history about creation is wrong.
http://answersingenesis.org/articles/wow/are-mutations-the-engine
Neandertal children's fossils
In reconstructing fragmented bones of Neandertal children, evolutionists assume that rates of development were equal to or faster than modern children. Belief in faster development, or earlier maturation, arises from viewing Neandertals as more primitive, or more ape-like than modern humans.
http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v8/i2/fossil.asp